IMGpapers 1980–83

Newspapers of the International Marxist Group and its forerunners, 1980–83

Detend abortion rights

Socialist Challenge No. 271, 26 November 1982 · pp. 1-2 of the scan · 327 words

The scan: sc-no271.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 1-4 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 1 of the scan

A NEW anti-abortion bill has been introduced inDy the peer Lord Robertson of Oakridge. He is a 52 year old merchant banker. The bill is SOOnSOTEC by the virulently anti-abortion organisation, the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children. restrict the grounds tor greatly abortion slightly amending the of the Act would then LET THE ISH pregnancy would involve serious risk to the of the pregnant woman, or if injury the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman or any existing family is substantially greater than if pregnancy were terminated (amendments in italics).

This move serious attack woman's right to choose. The labour movement must be alerted to mobilise immediately and massivedafeat for women will struggle of the whole working class. It will be a major step forward in the TOTIES CTIVELO the burden of the crisis working people.

OHLO will help undermine the unity of working women and men in the struggle against the Tories.

Failing this, the anti-abortionists are pushing an ammendment which would cut the time limit to 20 weeks. was tneir opinion artel the failure of the Corrie BACKIN 1979 that f they had limited their ammandment, it would have passed.

Normally a bill from the Lords would have little chance of becoming law without being given government time But the bill's timing coincides private members choosing bills.

The private members ballot dominated bv militant anti-abortionists. John LOTTIE Norman St John-Stevas Ray Witney and Donald Stewart are all well known for their anti-abortion views. There is already tremendous pressure from SPUC and others for of those MP's to take an This would be very dangerous as it would shorten the parliamentary procedure considerably.

time, the mobilisation of the labour movement only women's right to choose but, by the bills withdrawal gave the bloody nose. There reason why should do it again.

page 2 of the scan

PO Box 50, London N1 2XP Phone 01-359-8189/8180 (editorial and distribution) 'UNDER NO circumstances will we tolerate

← Involunțary anorexia strikes SCThe Luton 'horror story' →

Something wrong on this page?