IMGpapers 1980–83

Newspapers of the International Marxist Group and its forerunners, 1980–83

BE No truce from

Socialist Challenge No. 233, 18 February 1982 · p. 2 of the scan · 439 words

The scan: sc-no233.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 3-6 of 6; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 2 of the scan

ting any was Campaign, absolutely which put was the jority of the selection wing, the Committee.

attacked Foot, the Bishop's but now even the trade union Weighell and Socialist only recently praising the • Michael Foot has made his intentions clear. First, he attacked the Sheffield, Heeley, CLP for not re-selecting Frank Hooley as their MP. Foot said it was a 'deplorable event. For Foot and the maParliamentary Labour Party the democratic reforms of the constitution are OK so long as they are not used!

The right wing of the party is continuing to pursue their campaign against the of Militant supporters parliamentary candidates.

Meanwhile, the Organisation Committee, against the objections of the right has given its endorsement to Militant supporter Pat Wall as the candidate for Bradford North. But it seems likely that NEC will overrule the Organisation In a long interview with Chris Mullin in Tribune, Michael Foot makes it absolutely clear that he is giving no guarantees that Militant will not be witch-hunted further after the report of the special inquiry.

Shore and Hattersley interpret Stortford 'agreement' as carte blanche for them to attack the left, while the left wing keeps its mouth shut.

The answer to those who argue that a is necessary inside the party has been clearly given by the editors of Labour Herald, whose editors include Ted Knight and Ken Livingstone, in a special editorial.

Challenge endorses every word. The left must not disarm itself in the face of a continued right wing offensive. Rees, Healey and Varley. They won't abide by a truce "peace pact' is general election?

mous probicus. fronted will capitalism, millions out of work....

their interests only.

must not Combination ford should that a future Labour government will be different to the Wilson/Callaghan administrations which so bitterly disappointed Labour supporters and led to the defeat at the 1979 The next Labour government will face enorPrimarily, it will be economic Crisis of devastated industries and WICH SCIVO The Party must take sides with every strug grows more desperate every day..

Labour Councils throughout Britain should stand shoulder to shoulder with the unions as they battle for their very existence against laws aimed at taking them back to the days of the the kind fighting unity the Party needs. Bishop's Stortbe repudiated and a strategy developed along the lines which leads to victory, not betrayal and deteat.

----- pull-quotes -----

But there is no likelihood of these questions being fought out if the right-wing are allowed to dictate conditions for 'unity

gle against the government. A failure to do will only lend comfort to a Tory government which

← Labour HeraldMcAliskey election campaign Time to start a fight →

Something wrong on this page?