continued fight.
are conference decisions. rOOLS dreamer names not a tyrant like Wilson is beside the point here.
Perhaps more surprising in view or tne alleged 'truce' decided Bishop's Stortford, Foot's trenchant defence struggle against the right wing. Many at the meeting wanted to cool the fight against the of his witch-hunt against Peter Tatchell.
His argument specific. People like Tatchell have to be attacked because they refuse totendorse superiority parliament as the decisive MeCHansu change. In other words, it is not a matter of being in tavour of parliamentary activity; you nave venerate it as Foot does as the supreme embodiment of socialist activity:
The logic of this argument is clear. Foot is giving due warning of his inLennon pursue vengeance. Anvone who says that parliamentary activity is not supreme will be open to attack.
Foot's article in the Observer should be read and re-read by those who think that he 'prisoner' of the right They reveal that he has gone over, hook, line and sinker.
Its one already-decided project — a series of books questions socialism to be published by Penguin - has alreadi been pre-empted by Pluto The Society might have more use general educational institution, and the conference decided to set up local groups But there again, who will ine local groups aim educate and discuss with?
Even the educational tasks for socialists pose the problem of political orientation, for surely not even those as determinedly Zanu 'independent' as the Socialist Society committee want education for education's sake?
The one question of practical political orientation discussed by the conference was the Labour Party. The conterence decided not to allow the steering committee prepare proposals on aftination Labour Party.
This reflected the overwhelming composition of the conference - independent socialist intellectuals
Socialist Challenge PAMPHLETI 2000 copies sold in first week! Order your copies Socialist Challenge Polish school Two day educational school and political revolution for