impressive confusion. According to falling bricks', as Reagan fall out.
LEEC Geneva approached. important circles of ruling class opinion became alarmed by the pressure which the peace movement curopean governments. CAINE out for Reagan to offer the of Cruise and Pershin CU OBHU exhange for withdrawal of the Soviet SS20s, 554s and SS5s.
Thus, it was hoped, the West would be seen as the most committed to disarmament, when the Russians invitably rejected .he proposals in fact the zero optio is nothing more than a simple-minded fraud, aimed at breaking the momentum of ine peace movement. It consists TEOTOposing the Russians dismantle all weapons aimed at Europe In return the US will not plant Cruise, Pershing on European soil (Thank you very much!).
Arsenal While the zero option is to be ruthlessly applicd to Russia, it is more libera in its effects on the West's European , arsenal.
arsenal KIC LEE nuclear submarines, bombers and missiles already stationed In would Western Europe, remain untouched Reagan's proposal proposal amounts to nuclear superiority NATO in Europe In the event, the European peace movench ene aiv came ou wt Dying colours. Leaders o the movement in Germany and CND in Britain tacked Reagan's humbug. arose which are contesting the latest escala tion of the war drive. They have already scored successes. The European movement, together with the wave of protest commentators the 'air in Washington is full of the sound of Haig. -Weinberger and th Britain the Tories were naturaliy quick welcome pro posal. John Nott, Britan's ecretary of Defence said minutes of the President's SUCCCI heard the "applause we would expect.
fell themseives to we.come *this historic breakthrough These in cluded the old man peace himselt: Michael TOUL Healey's visit to Moscow, who saw his and as having played a decisive role in this piece of history became quite breathless in his praise of Nongan Enkind to suggest that his Would sights were set on watering dowi demands in nis own Party for unilteral disarmament?
In a curious and tetchy piece in the Guardian of November 30, EP Thomp son replied to reports that he opposed the Reagan proposal. *The response of the poace movement such a change in tone from This President Reagan must be positive; we must hold to our own unilateral posiand tions. "ves" to negotiations: "Yes but we WILSU but more Analysis for Nowhere in his lengthy article is there any analysis of the Reagan proposal or the role of arms reduction negotiations He out the possible effects o teing conducted by the Us the propaganda war and the USSR as dividing missies mo twu coumel posed camps, defending either the East or the Wes But he does not see • the real and dangerous diviSION OE LAE mOveRECH, CA emplified by the antics of Foot. between those who would place their faith in multilateralism and inter national negotiations, and those who see the need to fight their governments to a standstill and force them to discuss.
the attempt dissolve unilateralism into multilateralism that is the main danger to the movement. What is the risk that the peace movement might ideologically divided the USSR and the USA? This is highly unlikely.
Crisis The movement against the missiles is a result ot a crisis of credibility in both camps, but also a relatively of clear understanding that it and the West which is fuelling the war When Thompson says lif there are cnough nuclear weapons now Europe to destroy the con tinent 30 times over, what doe it matter if one side can do ir 14 times and the other 16?' he confuses the issues. The fact that both sides are engaged in competition does not tell you what lies behind the con wes The peace movement in quite right to ask the historica! question race? to Knowing who are the ag gressors, and motives, tells us who is the main enemy, the target for our actions. say Tracks Thompson, on Ine other hand. proposes a two pronged strategy. Based on the "fact' that both sides could blow us all to kingdom come, he proposes unilateralism,.and points multilateralism!
track; we push the nuclear powers.. to reverse arms drive, to negotiate reach reciprocal Socialist Challenge cond track remaim unilateral Nobody in their righ mind can have a principle objection to negotiation per se But to adopt ther half our i ratel)
equally foolish. Ever charleton and war mong and every specious wind bag in the world - froi the United WATO! through to Thatcher ar Reagan through Michael FOO! and World Disarmament Car paign all recommend same approach.
SALT In some cases this c be put down to naive But thoughtf cireles disarmame negotiations are a use means of hoodwinking t mass Thus the much hera LONCIIC EL ed "SALT" negotiatic were calmiy .CONCUE and annonced to world as a breakthrough control, just as had developed technology necessary put many war heads o simple missile. Stocks missiles were to be limi - but the number of heads was not discusse Hope In Britain, as in ot countries, many sect anti-missile mc ment have learnt thro bitter experience dangerous role of inte tional arms negotiation Thompson has fo their himself on the extr right of the movement he did so much to insi Many times in the pas have discovered today's leaders are in que tope orro n hope, the periences develop that HUICHE Thompson, and all i wil come whir us es will come with us compromising.
for unilatera disa ment, without in the the creating illusions tha can place hop negotiations.
10 December 1981 pa
Letter!
----- pull-quotes -----
alerted Europe to the latest missile nuclear fol- ly dreamt up by the Pentagon. In the wake of his courageous stand huge mass movements
Historic NATPOIOBISTE