IMGpapers 1980–83

Newspapers of the International Marxist Group and its forerunners, 1980–83

Incendiary

Socialist Challenge No. 199, 28 May 1981 · p. 5 of the scan · 222 words

The scan: sc-n199.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 6-7 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 5 of the scan

Not incendiary device straightforward flammable gas fire.

They heard glass was a 'red herring LaW l man is Peter firework'.

shortish and has old Errol should he? Commade unfair citizens?

Socialis: Challenge was found in the garden. Vir Higgs. tr the Royal Arsenal Explosive Labora: described it 'as the most commer He also did tests which proved th liquid found the room could not have been ignited by th The coroner suggested that the the Mr Pugh though coincidence' Henderson from Scotland Yard said ::

'amateurist So that dealt with the eye witnesses and the outside scientist The police have always insisted tha: there had been a fight at the party. Atie: all they had statements from five black youths to prove this. Now the fact tha: all five were on bail at the time of the party and had broken their curfew by being there did not influence them at all Just because ine bonce toless-veal Williams he would home' unless he said he was in the front room or one witness was told by a kindl! detective he would 'break his neck' 'and some of the youth were kept in custod!

five days should make challenge police evidence After all it did not make Dr Davie challenge them, so why should we less?

28 May 1981 Fage 5

← Deptford coroner: a suitable case for an inquiryWedge →

Something wrong on this page?