IMGpapers 1980–83

Newspapers of the International Marxist Group and its forerunners, 1980–83

Wrong on rape

Socialist Challenge No. 192, 9 April 1981 · p. 11 of the scan · 277 words

The scan: sc-n192-apr-09-1981.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 2-4 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 11 of the scan

confront male prejudice or 'male power' They choose to highlight rape as an issue because it its in with their view of working class men All men dIc Ical tionary - the oppressors. All women al c tionary - the oppressed. Why not hang rapists and really punish the pressor?

Socialist feminists have to do more than contront male prejudice. We need a strategy for eradicating it. That strategy accords the working class, as a class, the central role establishing socialism.

possible argue that the working class 1S revolutionary class, because progressive role, and in the same breath say that working class men have no interest struggle for women's liberation.

My article argued that working class men have more to gain women's liberation than by defending the status quo.

As individuals, may have higher pay than women but as a class they will gain from equal pay because Class will be stronger. individuals, men are SCI Vice c by women aca class they would gain from a more communal form of domestic labour.

As individuals, men may gain from the sexual subjugation women, but as a class thev have no reason support the social double-standards of the ruling class which treat women as commodities.

For Marxists the term 'material interest' means class interest. I maintain that working-class men have no class interest in the oppression of women, or any other group.

The fact that working class men, particularly Post Oftice engineers. • WIlU are skilled workers, believe that they gain from the oppression of working class women is a popular fallacy war socaust erns ike Jenny would do well to argue against.

VALERIE COULTAS, Birmingham

← No privileges on my platformPoland and the market →

Something wrong on this page?