IMGpapers 1980–83

Newspapers of the International Marxist Group and its forerunners, 1980–83

Vacancies

Socialist Challenge No. 174, 27 November 1980 · pp. 13-14 of the scan · 329 words

The scan: sc-n174-nov-27-1980.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 2-4 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 13 of the scan

with the addition of import the COELrOS.

This new book is also the most sophisticated defence of the strategy in print. grounded tirst analysis of — Holland's writings, the crisis TOSL for example. the retuse to acknowledge severity of the profits squeeze the and it discusses a number the of difficulties which accounts gloss over.

Finally, it is a good examle of the best strand of recent labour which is then taken up and plementation of the strategy in two broad (and not strictly chronological) first expansion is economy and a return to full a much better than the longer-run stubborniy move towards socialism. This the division is helpful.

London

expansion begins other discussion of the number needed growth of output required to create them; ¡lalci lal ull cell)

ment is impossible because of movement either skill shortages technology;

point.

the Sulale international market essential gets station.

that stages. The of the second 15 maintenance domestic economy.

CSE's case for arise of and the : a demolition o! gramme.

full employand a developgrowth controlled), foreign capital will not lose As London CSE acknowledges, this misses the Capital's main objection is more fundamental than export volumes. It is that import controls are an attempt to inforces.

Capital views these forces as the to discipline any national working class which aspirations above ILS the agreements blem is not to solve it. All the But to recognise a authors can do is to point out remains socialist government would face the same difficul- tempts at ty. True. But it would be in a control...

he problem because it woul Any have greater control over the deal This brings us to the second stage of the AES, where ment really fundamental problems Once full employment is approached, further progress strike.' depends on a major investment and modernisation pro London CSE recognises that capital would undertake this gleefully with profits desperately low and a radical Labour governin Atlanta thousand:

page 14 of the scan

← The Crash of 1980CLOSING DOWN →

Something wrong on this page?