Squeeze 10 per cent more on the NHSinit

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 1-1 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 5 of the scan

CIS that government would need to were to nve up tolls bromises ine • ories know mouse or commons vices committee: by year amount extra required, l you like, to stand still we wole nave a secone -cass health service in ten years if we gave them penny more; would gradually slip behind. Surplus What they don't admit is that this is exactly The more the NHS is squeezco. une creater rivale benents. Private nean musurance and treatment is already a moneyspinner: BUPA, though technically llas d surplus against sales of its policies of f95m.

Sheltered by the 'catch-all' NHS system, and helped by tax exempt status of both their insurance dusnes: and lac • Claril established develor private hospitals, BUPA has built up large Aided by the City's eagerness Tune recession-proot

----- pull-quotes -----

office a the Department not Radford, told the

recognise that year a small