IMGpapers 1980–83

Newspapers of the International Marxist Group and its forerunners, 1980–83

Bosses try ballot to end sit-in

· Socialist Challenge No. 172, 13 November 1980 · p. 3 of the scan · 374 words

The scan: sc-n172-nov-13-1980.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 3-6 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 3 of the scan

THE Gardner's occupation in Manchester the first major against the round of redundancies in the engineering dustry. £16,000n has been raised in factory Money coming colecuons around une and the AUEW district has voted for a weekly levy to support the Gardners oress But money alone cannot win the dispute Management has gone on to the offensive with its orruse a commody return to work, while local and national union officials preschil been scurrying for a compromise in- In a letter to all the Gardner's WOrKCIS Conted's secretary, said tnal tne ballot wa because there County agreement on Manchester to volunteer for eirseho dancv or eariy retirement. Only moderate offers have been made at present.

Ballot

decision to This is hardly a confident call have to the Gardner's around looking Corner sloos och districe that was une terms 'severance workers redun- policy trace return to work workers to maintain their refusal to sell each doesn't even management's terms of reference tive simply calls for negotiations on jobs must go.

tilal basis the ballot, not on the basis of a on unemployof "loyalty and decid workers'. It ine waraners work ers see no prospect of victory i this dispute, no amount of loyalt will prevent them voting for a da.

The myth of ballot democracy would also has to be tackled head on strength of union movement lies in its collecorganisation ment of all members in decision- week.

, following full discussion and the ability to act together o ballots, whoever he Workers have vote alone their co. workers. and with no counter to the media's anti-strike propaganThe best response to the ballo strengthen the meetnas in every saoo to exorall the purpose of the ballot and in volve the full membership in win : struggle.

Matatement Is not only or to end the dispute - i wants ic smash the unions' power in the The and chop wher redundancy notices went out las The only response to this can be to up the stakes in the dispute Gardner's should be in the TUC-Labour Party marer gains men over or 29 November. There should be a action to support Gardner's and fight redundancy That's the kind of lead that Gardner's workers need.

← 'The Gardner's occupation has shown it's possible to fight closures'Benn backs the occupation →

Something wrong on this page?