IMGpapers 1980–83

Newspapers of the International Marxist Group and its forerunners, 1980–83

'are not defensivé'

Socialist Challenge No. 171, 6 November 1980 · p. 7 of the scan · 286 words

The scan: sc-n171-nov-06-1980.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 6-6 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 7 of the scan

I WAS amazed to read Brian Grogan's piece on nuclear weapons 9 Oc To•er. ITo rie avn credible I haven't read anything like it from the mention just point. •vial says 'The GOSSeSSIOn weapons ov the soviei Union is overwhelmingly defensive weapons (intercontinen lal missues ane domoers.

Aa e racca toos to implement the theory of theory developed in the Second World War bv the Britist and Americans said quite simply that you can most quickly defeat your by destroying their industries by bomb I AS Verv •UCKE decame accepted orthodoxy and was practis edd gainst both Germany the myth about the strateaic air ottensive las perpetuated in films Dambusters) that it works. In fact Cbs !

Americans oune out ir Vietnam when that coun failed to against Germany and Japan either but that's anomier store Ine DoInt is toRTIs generally accepted the the sian military no less than Lue Ammencan ine secono oolts that the strategic air offensive is precisely that - offensive. I cannot see how abstrusue American. and other Western countries industry can be a 'defensive' policy of a workers stald Perhaps comraoe Cr0can might reconsider his position:

worker. bomb ha:

Trazzled all into Ciders BARRY PAVIER, London Fleet St Star MENTION of Lord Matthews, the boss of Express Newspapers and Cunard (30 Ocreminded me of a TV interviev some monins ago, the political con-game Matthews said that he personally vetted every editorial in his paper. Anything which displeased him came out. That's Mecause OlIe ot his the Daily Star, broadly supports the Callaghan-Healey mob. Matthews evidently does not regard the Labour riaht as a threat to canitalism This just shows how much choice voters

----- pull-quotes -----

toi grind Kalt.

← Soviet unilateral'London dominated' →

Something wrong on this page?