IMGpapers 1980–83

Newspapers of the International Marxist Group and its forerunners, 1980–83

LABOUR DEMOCRACY ofend mandatory re

Socialist Challenge No. 154, 3 July 1980 · p. 3 of the scan · 365 words

The scan: sc-n154-jul-03-1980.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 4-5 of 7; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 3 of the scan

Contributors in minimised; most powers.of conright-wing Dennis DEFEND HE NEG 2 Lounched peant The mobilising committee college, other hand, is simply conference in a different form. The leadership election would take place as part of normal conference procedures, the votes would be counted differently. the votes would go to the industrial wing of the movement - the trade unions — and the other half to the political wing, through MPs or candidates and constituency parties.

All constituencies, all trade unions and all MPs or candidates would have a vote.

Skinner, had

untenable who advocated themselves:

AUEW'S 900,000 ference.

there might not even which would file. of conference.

on the , but conference delegations.

Half File Mobilising Committee.

Offers to help to London NW1I (01-458 1501). opposed the However, it now appears that the majority are divided among Duffy says he will cast the votes against it, and Callaghan/Foot probably only supported it on the assumption that it would fall at conference and leave the status quo — which it almost certainly would if it was actually put to conThe disarray of the right is so severe that be a majority report, strengthen the left mobilising committee. The majority proposal on the control of the manifesto is therefore perhaps even more of a threat to the rank and If their proposed electoral college had control, that would be considerably worse than the present system, since, with half the college, the parliamentary party would be in absolute control. Whatever the composition of the college to give it any powers other than the election of the leaders would be to subvert the supremacy Whatever happens at conference this year the struggle will continue; but there is an opportunity this year to make fundamental changes in the nature of the Labour Party. So no opportunity should be lost to put pressure on the Labour Party NEC, trade union executives and John Lansman is the secretary of the Rank and organise rallies, to distribute our broadsheet 'Mobilise for Labour Democracy', to Jon Lansman at 10 Park Drive,

----- pull-quotes -----

MilL must decido the The Party mad choct the Loo БМАКЕ TER Rank & File Mobilising Committee

← 'Prior's a liar says SkinnerBacking up the pay front →

Something wrong on this page?