IMGpapers 1980–83

Newspapers of the International Marxist Group and its forerunners, 1980–83

Students against Corrie

· Socialist Action (League for Socialist Action) Vol. 3, No. 2, February 1980 · p. 8 of the scan · 421 words

The scan: Socialist Action v3 no2 Feb 1980.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 5-6 of 6; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 8 of the scan

blame? (Below Liz Eastham, LSE student. describes how the College Women's Group mobilised for the mass CAC demonstration last year and is continuing the activities this year.)

On Monday Oct 8th, the LSE Women's Group met to decide how to give the fullest support to the TUC's call for a demonstration against Corrie on Oct 28th. As part of the LSE's Campaign Against Corrie, a sub-group was set up to consider the different actions to be taken leading up to the demo.

In the next few weeks, a stall was set up and people were asked to sign the CAC petition against Corrie. All public rooms in the school were flyposted and leafletted. There was a huge response to this aspect of the campaign, hundreds of people signing the petition and a great many useful and interesting discussions being As part of the build up, two meetings were held, one featuring Glenys Cousins of Women's Voice and the other Dr Wendy Savage of NAC who explained to a packed meeting precisely how the Corrie Bill would affect women. Her wide professional experience and understanding of women seeking abortions allowed her to answer the wide-ranging questions raised by the audience. Many of the people attending came away far more aware of both the need for an abortion service and the implications of the Corrie restrictions.

During this period, it was clear that SPUC was also trying to win support. A room had been booked at the college for Oct 27th. While there was a debate in the campaign as to whether or not the meeting should be allowed to go ahead, it was finally decided there were no grounds for cancelling it but that it should be picketted.

However, it was later discovered that SPUC had booked the room as a private meeting, attendance being limited only to those who had bought tickets. At this stage the campaign drew up a letter of objection to the meeting and it was agreed by the University authorities that, since the union had given its backing to the Campaign Against Corrie and since SPUC was infringing the LSE's own guidelines on letting rooms to outside bodies, the meeting should be cancelled. MASS TURN-OUT In the last two weeks before the demonstration, there was growing activity in the college. The information stall was kept busy and the petition was supported by teaching staff, porters and administrative workers as well as a huge number of home and overseas students.

NALGO and the NUS have DEAD

← WE TOO LIVE IN THE AGE OF "INELATIONEOVER OUR BODIES CORRIE →

Something wrong on this page?